Home | News | Hatcheries ‘May Damage Salmon Populations’

Hatcheries ‘May Damage Salmon Populations’

By
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Hatcheries ‘May Damage Salmon Populations’

Fisheries Trusts’ report concludes that the use of hatcheries on salmon rivers is generally futile and may actually damage salmon populations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: RAFTS

 

A new review by the Rivers and Fisheries Trusts of Scotland (RAFTS) of the practice of artificial stocking of salmon rivers has concluded emphatically that there should be “a general presumption against stocking of salmon” as the practice is an inefficient method of boosting catches. A comprehensive body of scientific evidence, both national and international, was examined, leading to the consensus view that “enhancement stocking is largely ineffective and potentially harmful”.


The RAFTS Stocking Policy is being launched today (20 March) at the Annual RAFTS/ASFB Conference at Battleby by Perth.


Brian Davidson, RAFTS Operations Director and Convenor of the RAFTS Salmon Stocking sub group, said:

“Since the 19th century salmon stocking has been routinely carried out in the belief that it improves fish numbers. Only recently, in the last two decades, has the practice been subjected to proper scrutiny. The evidence is now overwhelming that in most circumstances, far from being a panacea, salmon stocking makes no discernible difference to salmon numbers and often may actually be detrimental”.


An extensive study on the River Spey has demonstrated that the hatchery made an annual contribution to the rod catch of between zero and 1.8% in any given year. When account is taken of the fact that adult fish have to be removed from the wild to generate eggs and subsequently juveniles and that these fish would probably have spawned in any case, then any apparent minor “benefit” of the hatchery may well be outweighed by the reduction in natural spawning and juvenile production with survival rates for the latter likely to be higher than those achieved by hatchery reared fish.


Apart from the removal of fish which would otherwise have spawned naturally, other negative impacts include restocking eggs and fry in places where the adults would not have naturally spawned, and issues associated with the mixing up of different fish from different parts of a system which can dilute or change natural population structures.


Roger Brook, RAFTS Board member, commented:

“Fishery Boards which stock salmon rivers for enhancement purposes need to ask some searching questions. Can they show definitively that their stocking is beneficial? Have they considered the impact their intervention will have on natural spawning? Furthermore hatcheries divert resources and manpower that could be more usefully employed in tackling other issues that are much more likely to increase stocks including removing man-made physical barriers to fish migration, restoring habitat and reducing human exploitation”.


RAFTS’ “general presumption against stocking of salmon” applies except in very specific circumstances, such as where there has been significant habitat loss or there are insurmountable challenges. Thus, in contrast to enhancement stocking, the RAFTS review acknowledges that “mitigation stocking” (to compensate for lost production due to a man-made scheme, such as a hydro-power dam, or activity that cannot be prevented or removed) or “restoration stocking” (for example where a population has been lost) may well be appropriate within defined parameters.


Pdfs of the RAFTS Stocking Policy Statement and the RAFTS Stocking Policy Technical Paper may be found in the attachment section in the right hand column of this webpage.







Articles by the same author





Comments (0 posted):

Add/View Comments

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Tagged as:

RAFTS

Rate this article

0

Follow Fish&Fly!